Skip to content

Nobel laureates sometimes display as much ingenuity when deciding how to spend their prize money as they did on the work that won them the award in the first place

SENIOR TRANS resource library · Language and culture archive

Before you read

Subject: Nobel laureates sometimes display as much ingenuity when deciding how to spend their prize money as they did on the work that won them the award in the first place

Excerpt: English text from the archived bilingual edition · Chinese edition

Reference text and retained source material

Nobel laureates sometimes display as much ingenuity when deciding how to spend their prize money as they did on the work that won them the award in the first place

When Sir Paul Nurse won the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2001, he decided to upgrade his motorbike. A fellow winner in 1993, Richard Roberts, installed a croquet lawn in front of his house. Austrian author Elfriede Jelinek, who won in 2004, said the prize meant "financial independence."

Lars Heikensten, executive director of the Nobel Foundation, said there were no obvious shopping trends among laureates

"I think it depends a lot on which country they come from, their personal finances... what kind of incomes they have when they get the prize, and where they are in life," he said

Real estate, however, is a popular option, at least among those willing to reveal what they spend the money on

Over a million dollars sounds like a lot but it is often shared between several winners, diluting their Nobel spending power

Wolfgang Ketterle at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who shared the 2001 physics prize with two colleagues, put his share towards a house and his children's education

"Since half goes to taxes in the US, there was nothing (more) left," he said

Phillip Sharp, the American co-winner of the 1993 medicine prize, decided to splash out on a 100-year-old Federal style house

"I took that money and bought a little bit bigger house... It's a beautiful old place," he told AFP, adding that "The money is a nice part of the process" but "the important thing about the prize is the recognition."

For winners of the peace prize the decision is often more clear-cut, as the honour tends to go to politicians, organisations and activists who are under more public scrutiny

Many, like US President Barack Obama in 2009 and the European Union in 2012, donate to charities

Others support pet projects: the 2008 winner, former Finnish president Martti Ahtisaari, said he would finance a conflict resolution group he had set up

Former US president Woodrow Wilson won the prize in 1920 but left it in a Swedish bank to earn interest, apparently because he was concerned about life after retirement in an age when former presidents got no government pension, according to one biography

Literature laureates tend to be more private about how they use the money, but the choice is often equally straightforward

"Even if Nobel-winning authors are quite well known, many of them will not have made much money from writing," said Anna Gunder, a Nobel literature expert at Uppsala University

While the prize might keep the wolf from the door for some years, giving them freedom to write, it can also briefly have the opposite effect

"It really changes their careers... During the first year after they've won they often write less, but they generally continue after a year or two," said Gunder

Original reference image

Language and reading: using this material

Compare wording, tone and information order across complete passages. Positions, prices, policies, exams and statistics retain their original context and should be verified before practical use.

Let’s talk about your next project.

Send your languages, files and deadline. We will help define the scope.

Request a quote
WeChatScan to contact SENIOR TRANS on WeChat